- Submit post-lecture quiz before the tutorial
- Submit Midterm Peer Evaluations on TEAMMATES by Sunday 15th March
1 Submit post-lecture quiz before the tutorial
- Post-lecture quiz: Read weekly topics allocated for this week and submit the post-lecture quiz before the following lecture.
2 Submit Midterm Peer Evaluations on TEAMMATES by Sunday 15th March
- Peer Evaluation Round 1 will open on TEAMMATES. You will receive the submission link soon.
Admin Peer Evaluations → Session: Midterm Peer Evaluation
Session: Midterm Peer Evaluation
- Held about two weeks into the tP
Important questions included in the evaluation:
Some of these questions (e.g., contribution to DG) are omitted from the midterm peer evaluation but are in the final peer evaluation (they are given here for your reference)
Uses the Equal Share +/- N% scale for the answer
Uses the Equal Share +/- N% scale for the answer
Uses the Equal Share +/- N% scale for the answer
- Evaluated based on the following criteria, on a scale
Poor/Below Average/Average/Good/Excellent:
Peer Evaluation Criteria: Professional Conduct
- Professional Communication :
- Communicates sufficiently and professionally. e.g. Does not use offensive language or excessive slang in project communications.
- Responds to communication from team members in a timely manner (e.g. within 24 hours).
- Punctuality: Does not cause others to waste time or slow down project progress by frequent tardiness.
- Dependability: Promises what can be done, and delivers what was promised.
- Effort: Puts in sufficient effort to, and tries their best to keep up with the module/project pace. Seeks help from others when necessary.
- Quality: Does not deliver work products that seem to be below the student's competence level i.e. tries their best to make the work product as high quality as possible within her competency level.
- Meticulousness:
- Rarely overlooks submission requirements.
- Rarely misses compulsory module activities such as pre-module survey.
- Teamwork: How willing are you to act as part of a team, contribute to team-level tasks, adhere to team decisions, etc. Honors all collectively agreed-upon commitments e.g., weekly project meetings.
- Considered only for bonus marks, A+ grades, and tutor recruitment
- Evaluated based on the following criteria, on a scale
Poor/Below Average/Average/Good/Excellent:
Peer Evaluation Criteria: Competency
- Technical Competency: Able to gain competency in all the required tools and techniques.
- Mentoring skills: Helps others when possible. Able to mentor others well.
- Communication skills: Able to communicate (written and spoken) well. Takes initiative in discussions.